北京大学陆林院士多篇论文造假

by 方舟子, at 21 June 2020, tags : 论文 新语丝 点击纠错 点击删除
使用CN2/CN2GIA顶级线路,支持Shadowsocks/V2ray科学上网,支持支付宝付款,每月仅需 5 美元
## 加入品葱精选 Telegram Channel ##

北京大学陆林院士多篇论文造假

方舟子先生,你好!

我是一名研究药物依赖机理的科研人员。自2018年初起,我陆续收到多封邮件,内容为举报北京大学陆林(中国科学院院士)多篇论文造假。现转发给你。

其中,陆林于2005年以第一作者身份发表在Nature Neuroscience(NN)杂志上题目为Central amygdala ERK signaling pathway is critical to incubation of cocaine craving(Nat Neurosci. 2005 Feb;8(2):212-9)的论文中存在重复使用同一个蛋白质免疫印迹(Western Blot)图片的严重学术不端行为(见附件1)。数月前,该论文通讯作者,美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)国家药物滥用研究所(NIDA)资深研究员Yavin Shaham博士发给药物依赖领域同行的邮件,文中对此学术不端事实认定清楚,目前正等待Nature Neuroscience杂志的处理决定。对于此事,如有疑问,可联系Yavin Shaham博士(yshaham@intra.nida.nih.gov)或Nature Neuroscience杂志主编Kevin Da Silva博士(k.dasilva@us.nature.com)进行证实。虽然如此,NIH,NIDA以及NN至今未作出任何处理或公开回应。

此外,陆林在北大期间发表的五篇论文也存在“重复使用同一张图片”学术不端行为(附件2-5)。

附Yavin Shaham博士来信:

Dear All,

Several of the recipients of the email below forwarded it to me because the 2005 Nature Neuroscience paper with the duplicate images is from a collaborative paper of my lab and Bruce Hope’s lab. We received an email from Dr. Rider about this problem in January. After receiving this initial email, we confirmed that the images were, in fact, duplicates. After this, we notified the NN editor that there was a problem with the western blot images, and then independently reanalyzed the available western blots from the study using the same imaging program used originally, statistically reanalyzed all other behavioral and pharmacology data in the study and sent the results of our reanalysis to the editor. Currently, we are waiting for the NN editorial staff to make a decision about our paper. If any of you have concerns about this matter, please feel free to contact me or Bruce and we will answer any questions regarding our 2005 NN paper.

Yavin Shaham

(XYS20180913)

最简单好用的 VPS,没有之一,注册立得 100 美金
comments powered by Disqus

See Also

长江学者、国家杰青北京大学侯仰龙涉嫌造假

长江学者、国家杰青北京大学侯仰龙涉嫌造假 方先生: 作为一名默默无闻的科技工作者,对于恪守学术道德有着崇高的敬畏之心。然而,有时看到一些恶劣的学术不端行为,尤其是一些大牛的学术不端行为,就感到很震惊,也很愤慨! 近期在阅读文献时,发现了储能 …