美国政府将拒绝承认几乎所有的中国在南海的领海宣称

使用CN2/CN2GIA顶级线路，支持Shadowsocks/V2ray科学上网，支持支付宝付款，每月仅需 5 美元

## 加入品葱精选 Telegram Channel ##

更新，官宣：
https://www.state.gov/u-s-position-on-maritime-claims-in-the-south-china-sea/

U.S. Position on Maritime Claims in the South China Sea
PRESS STATEMENT

MICHAEL R. POMPEO, SECRETARY OF STATE

JULY 13, 2020

The United States champions a free and open Indo-Pacific. Today we are strengthening U.S. policy in a vital, contentious part of that region — the South China Sea. We are making clear: Beijing’s claims to offshore resources across most of the South China Sea are completely unlawful, as is its campaign of bullying to control them.

In the South China Sea, we seek to preserve peace and stability, uphold freedom of the seas in a manner consistent with international law, maintain the unimpeded flow of commerce, and oppose any attempt to use coercion or force to settle disputes. We share these deep and abiding interests with our many allies and partners who have long endorsed a rules-based international order.

These shared interests have come under unprecedented threat from the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Beijing uses intimidation to undermine the sovereign rights of Southeast Asian coastal states in the South China Sea, bully them out of offshore resources, assert unilateral dominion, and replace international law with “might makes right.” Beijing’s approach has been clear for years. In 2010, then-PRC Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi told his ASEAN counterparts that “China is a big country and other countries are small countries and that is just a fact.” The PRC’s predatory world view has no place in the 21st century.

The PRC has no legal grounds to unilaterally impose its will on the region. Beijing has offered no coherent legal basis for its “Nine-Dashed Line” claim in the South China Sea since formally announcing it in 2009. In a unanimous decision on July 12, 2016, an Arbitral Tribunal constituted under the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention – to which the PRC is a state party – rejected the PRC’s maritime claims as having no basis in international law. The Tribunal sided squarely with the Philippines, which brought the arbitration case, on almost all claims.

As the United States has previously stated, and as specifically provided in the Convention, the Arbitral Tribunal’s decision is final and legally binding on both parties. Today we are aligning the U.S. position on the PRC’s maritime claims in the SCS with the Tribunal’s decision. Specifically:

The PRC cannot lawfully assert a maritime claim – including any Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) claims derived from Scarborough Reef and the Spratly Islands – vis-a-vis the Philippines in areas that the Tribunal found to be in the Philippines’ EEZ or on its continental shelf. Beijing’s harassment of Philippine fisheries and offshore energy development within those areas is unlawful, as are any unilateral PRC actions to exploit those resources. In line with the Tribunal’s legally binding decision, the PRC has no lawful territorial or maritime claim to Mischief Reef or Second Thomas Shoal, both of which fall fully under the Philippines’ sovereign rights and jurisdiction, nor does Beijing have any territorial or maritime claims generated from these features.
As Beijing has failed to put forth a lawful, coherent maritime claim in the South China Sea, the United States rejects any PRC claim to waters beyond a 12-nautical mile territorial sea derived from islands it claims in the Spratly Islands (without prejudice to other states’ sovereignty claims over such islands). As such, the United States rejects any PRC maritime claim in the waters surrounding Vanguard Bank (off Vietnam), Luconia Shoals (off Malaysia), waters in Brunei’s EEZ, and Natuna Besar (off Indonesia). Any PRC action to harass other states’ fishing or hydrocarbon development in these waters – or to carry out such activities unilaterally – is unlawful.
The PRC has no lawful territorial or maritime claim to (or derived from) James Shoal, an entirely submerged feature only 50 nautical miles from Malaysia and some 1,000 nautical miles from China’s coast. James Shoal is often cited in PRC propaganda as the “southernmost territory of China.” International law is clear: An underwater feature like James Shoal cannot be claimed by any state and is incapable of generating maritime zones. James Shoal (roughly 20 meters below the surface) is not and never was PRC territory, nor can Beijing assert any lawful maritime rights from it.
The world will not allow Beijing to treat the South China Sea as its maritime empire. America stands with our Southeast Asian allies and partners in protecting their sovereign rights to offshore resources, consistent with their rights and obligations under international law. We stand with the international community in defense of freedom of the seas and respect for sovereignty and reject any push to impose “might makes right” in the South China Sea or the wider region.

品葱用户 翠翠主义 评论于 2020-07-13

这下出大事了……不知道下一步中共会怎么接招

品葱用户 **Acca0429

翠翠主义** 评论于 2020-07-13

[

这下出大事了……不知道下一步中共会怎么接招

]( “/article/item_id-438979#”)

「南海自古以來就是我國領土，禁止美國干涉我國內政」

品葱用户 孟早舟 评论于 2020-07-13

中共割东南亚韭菜的妄想泡汤了。
关键是有大量的东南亚华人，明明自己是要被割的韭菜，还为中共唱赞歌。

品葱用户 **kill_ccp

Acca0429** 评论于 2020-07-13

[

「南海自古以來就是我國領土，禁止美國干涉我國內政」

]( “/article/item_id-438980#”)
南海虽然名字叫South China Sea，但从来不是中国独占的领土。难道日本海就是日本领土了？
别忘了《南海各方行为宣言》。

品葱用户 **Acca0429

kill_ccp** 评论于 2020-07-14

[

南海虽然名字叫South China Sea，但从来不是中国独占的领土。难道日本海就是日本领土了？别…

]( “/article/item_id-438986#”)

很遺憾的是中國外交部不怎麼覺得，之前外交部跟粉紅用的理由就是這個。

品葱用户 庆丰自挂东南枝 评论于 2020-07-13

我操！这还了得！虽远必诛啊！
哎不对，它这事好像离得有点近，想想钓鱼岛和海参崴…算了，不诛了，睡大觉！

品葱用户 **kill_ccp

Acca0429** 评论于 2020-07-14

[

很遺憾的是中國外交部不怎麼覺得，之前外交部跟粉紅用的理由就是這個。

]( “/article/item_id-438987#”)
中共当年自己签的（维基百科连结）
出尔反尔？

品葱用户 白糸射在黑丝腿上 评论于 2020-07-13

老米牌多的是，tg几乎每次都只有被动应付。接下来老米就是要重提16年的南海仲裁。趁尼发大水把尼在南海拱出来的卒连珊瑚根给它炸了😋尼刁是不是再集结一次三舰队去对峙啊😋士气就会再而衰三而竭😋人家只要双航母就可以牵制尼全部的海军兵力😋不去对线吧。人家肯定趁尼兵力不够制造摩擦拿下南海桥头堡😋而且老米还是会挑战场的，就是要远离尼大陆的火力优势之外搞事😋

品葱用户 **Acca0429

kill_ccp** 评论于 2020-07-14

[

中共当年自己签的（）出尔反尔？

]( “/article/item_id-438989#”)

中英聯合聲明都能說是歷史文件了，你說呢？

品葱用户 圣锹游侠 评论于 2020-07-13

建议下令逮捕特朗普

品葱用户 何月平 评论于 2020-07-14

是可忍孰不可忍 請習近平叔叔發出戰鬥的號召
攻打美國，剷平華盛頓活捉特朗普，活摘其器官，挽回14億華人同胞的民族尊嚴！

品葱用户 Emmanuels 评论于 2020-07-14

制裁特朗普，不许用墙国产品，不许他的孙子来墙国读书，不许他的家人在墙国存款和投资，不许他的家人来墙国。

品葱用户 **ab842612

Acca0429** 评论于 2020-07-13

[

很遺憾的是中國外交部不怎麼覺得，之前外交部跟粉紅用的理由就是這個。

]( “/article/item_id-438987#”)
印度洋………….

品葱用户 **包将无包不负韭菜

Acca0429** 评论于 2020-07-13

[

「南海自古以來就是我國領土，禁止美國干涉我國內政」

]( “/article/item_id-438980#”)
“建议美方同中方恢复互利共赢、自由平等的双边对话，对不利于两国关系正常发展的话题暂时搁置争议”

穷则搁置争议，达则自古以来。

品葱用户 **Acca0429

ab842612** 评论于 2020-07-13

[

印度洋………….

]( “/article/item_id-439007#”)

我跟你說，那些在外網對戰的粉紅，用的理由是「因為鄭和下西洋，所以南海海域是我們的」

品葱用户 华国锋 评论于 2020-07-13

所以我说要给川普政府点信心，反共方面，川普政府一年做的事，其他政府四年任期都做不到。就这一帮人还希望国会今天立法，川普明天就把香港关税升上去。

制定政策要一帮人撰写，开会，听证，哪怕卖个房，手续也不是一两天就能完成的。很多人就硬是不知道这么简单的道理，张口川伯伦闭口你川绥靖。所以现在我是不反对他们支持拜登了，反正BLM已经让自由派暴露了足够的丑态，足以影响摇摆州了。

品葱用户 hun 评论于 2020-07-14

我的疑問是，美國不承認在國際上有什麼威壓力？
我理解這樣中國出兵南海侵犯其他國家領域美國會做軍事上的協助，還有別的好處嗎

品葱用户 **包农奴才

庆丰自挂东南枝** 评论于 2020-07-13

[

我操！这还了得！虽远必诛啊！哎不对，它这事好像离得有点近，想想钓鱼岛和海参崴…算了，不诛了，睡大…

]( “/article/item_id-438988#”)

远则诛，近则熊

品葱用户 **Acca0429

hun** 评论于 2020-07-14

[

我的疑問是，美國不承認在國際上有什麼威壓力？我理解這樣中國出兵南海侵犯其他國家領域美國會做軍事上的協…

]( “/article/item_id-439030#”)

美國不承認-大半個地球不承認南海是中國的，而這大半個地球基本上就包括了亞洲地區（除了中國），以及西方世界（畢竟海牙法庭已經宣判中國打輸南海官司）

品葱用户 **hun

Acca0429** 评论于 2020-07-14

[

美國不承認-大半個地球不承認南海是中國的，而這大半個地球基本上就包括了亞洲地區（除了中國），以及西方…

]( “/article/item_id-439033#”)
真是撕破了臉呢……不過估計中國也不敢有什麼回應，最多就是外交部背書清單裡的那幾句話

品葱用户 **润之的忏悔

hun** 评论于 2020-07-13

[

我的疑問是，美國不承認在國際上有什麼威壓力？我理解這樣中國出兵南海侵犯其他國家領域美國會做軍事上的協…

]( “/article/item_id-439030#”)

这只是美国自身立场转变，不一定能够影响其他国家的立场，我个人理解是确定了美国海军在南海军事行动的合法性，原本美军的反应必须建立在中国和南海诸国发生冲突后，建立禁飞禁航区的基础上，美军的角色被限定在维和部队或者协助防御方。而现在美军的行动准则被放开，只要不侵犯中国的领土主权，对那些在公海和争议海域的人工岛可以进行拆迁作业。

品葱用户 skunk 评论于 2020-07-14

美国不承认就是给周边国家撑腰，谁这时候出来圈地，看看维尼硬不硬😄，最好你先动手。

品葱用户 **包将无包不负韭菜

Acca0429** 评论于 2020-07-13

~已删除~

点击品葱原文参与讨论

最简单好用的 VPS,没有之一，注册立得 100 美金